MONDAY MAR 04, 2024
×
Search AeroXplorer
Children in the Cockpit: The Crash of Aeroflot Flight 593

Children in the Cockpit: The Crash of Aeroflot Flight 593

BY HADI AHMAD January 01, 2024 0 COMMENTS

The idea of having children visit the cockpit of an aircraft raises few eyebrows nowadays due to the assumption that the plane is not in flight and the pilots, who are not occupied with controlling the plane, have allowed the visit.

 

The narrative understandably changes when the scenario changes to the aircraft being in flight. Having children or any otherwise unauthorized individual visiting the cockpit during this time is a risky endeavor. Such a scenario was present in the tragic case of Aeroflot Flight 593.

 

Photo: Jacob Smith | AeroXplorer

 

Background

 

On March 23, 1994, Aeroflot Flight 593 operated a regularly scheduled flight from Moscow's Sheremetyevo International Airport (SVO) to Hong Kong's now-defunct Kai Tak Airport. The aircraft operating was a nearly three-year-old Airbus A310-300 registered F-OGQS and one of five A310s in Aeroflot's fleet at the time. The A310 is a widebody aircraft that can accommodate between 220 and 240 passengers, depending on the cabin configuration. 

 



ADVERTISEMENT • REMOVE ALL ADS

 

On this particular day, Flight 593 had a rather light load with just 63 passengers and 12 crew. Forty passengers were Russian nationals, while the remaining 23 were foreigners from Hong Kong and Taiwan. The trio in charge of commandeering the A310 that day were Captain Andrey Viktorovich Danilov, First Officer Igor Vasilyevich Piskaryov, and Relief Captain Yaroslav Vladimirovich Kudrinsky. 

 

The Airbus A310-300 aircraft involved in the accident, pictured in March 1993 | Photo: Wikimedia Commons

 

All three aviators had a wealth of experience flying Russian-built aircraft but still spent many hours on foreign-built planes like the Airbus A310. Despite having over 9,500 flight hours, Captain Danilov had around 950 hours in the A310. First Officer Piskaryov had 5,885 flight hours, with 440 in the A310. Finally, Relief Captain Kudrinsky had over 8,400 flight hours, 907 of which were in the Airbus A310. These gentlemen were familiar with flying the A310.

 

What Went Wrong?

 

Kudrinsky had brought along his two children, who were going on their first international flight. While the flight was airborne and cruising, he invited them to the cockpit while on duty. Because the A310 was cruising, the autopilot was active, so none of the three pilots were operating the aircraft. However, against regulations, Kudrinsky let his children sit at the controls of the A310, which, in the end, proved to be the life-or-death situation for Flight 593.

 

Photo: Thomas Tse | AeroXplorer

 

Kudrinsky's 13-year-old daughter, Yana, sat in the Captain's seat. Nothing significant was reported during Yana's time "at the controls." However, Kudrinsky slightly adjusted the autopilot to give his daughter the impression that she was turning the plane. After Yana's turn was up, Kudrinsky's 15-year-old son Eldar occupied the seat. Eldar applied enough force to the control column that the flight computer switched the plane from autopilot to manual control of the ailerons.

 



ADVERTISEMENT • REMOVE ALL ADS

 

Now, a 15-year-old was in control of the Airbus A310. When the autopilot disengaged, a silent indicator light alerted the pilots. However, the pilots had most experience flying Soviet aircraft that were built with audible warnings. Therefore, despite all three having significant experience on the A310, none were able to notice the disengagement warning.

 

Wreckage from the crash site | Photo: Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives

 

Soon after, the plane began banking continuously to the right. This continuous turn caused a 180-degree turn on the flight computers. As reported by the flight recorders, the pilots were confused about this reading for nine seconds. The plane's bank angle increased from 45 to 90 degrees during those nine seconds.

 

The A310 is not designed to turn so steeply while maintaining its cruising altitude. Because of the steep angle, it became too difficult for the pilots to regain control. Despite not controlling the ailerons, the autopilot was still controlling the pitch and thrust. As such, the thrust was increased, but the nose pitched up steeply, which caused the plane to stall. This eventually caused the autopilot to switch off, sending the aircraft into rapid descent.

 

More wreckage from the crash site | Photo: Cockpit Voice Recorder Database

 

The pilots were able to regain access to their seats somehow. First Officer Piskaryov managed to pull out of the dive but overcorrected, putting the plane into a near-vertical ascent, which stalled the A310 again. This stall then sent the plane into a spin. Kudrinsky then almost recovered from the spin but also pulled back too aggressively. This caused the speed to drop and then eventually another spin.

 



ADVERTISEMENT • REMOVE ALL ADS

 

Kudrinsky and Piskaryov managed to recover control and level the wings again. Sadly, it was too late because their altitude was too low to recover. Aeroflot Flight 593 crashed into a remote hillside in the Kuznetsk Alatau mountain chain. All 75 occupants perished on impact.

 

People investigating the crash site | Photo: Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives

 

Aftermath

 

In the wake of Flight 593's demise, stricter restrictions on cockpit access were implemented. Nowadays, the flight cockpit has been strictly off-limits to passengers, especially children. Pilots, standby employees in some cases, and individuals with expressed consent from the airline and crew are the only ones able to access the cockpit in flight these days.

 

The example of Captain Kudrinsky was meant in good faith. He was a proud individual trying to show his children what their father did for a living. Unfortunately, this bonding moment took a turn for the worse. A similar instance transpired earlier this year in Brazil when a pilot flying under the influence ceded control of his propeller aircraft to his minor son. This ended up leading to the aircraft's crash and both of their demises.

 



ADVERTISEMENT • REMOVE ALL ADS

 AeroXplorer is on Telegram! Subscribe to the AeroXplorer Telegram Channel to receive aviation news updates as soon as they are released. View Channel 
Hadi Ahmad
Lifelong aviation enthusiast raised in Central Illinois. 777 is the best plane BTW.

Comments (0)

Add Your Comment

SHARE

TAGS

INFORMATIONAL Aeroflot Russia Airbus A310 A310-300 Incident Safety History Crash SVO Moscow

RECENTLY PUBLISHED

Plane Takes King Harald V Back to Norway After Medical Procedure in Malaysia Europe's oldest reigning monarch, 87-year-old Norwegian King Harald V, has returned home to Norway after receiving a pacemaker while on vacation in Malaysia. On February 28,¬†Scandinavian Airlines' dedicated Boeing 737-700 medevac (air ambulance) aircraft¬†took off from Oslo Airport (OSL) bound for Langkawi (LGK). On March 3, the SAS medevac aircraft began its return to Oslo, carrying King Harald. NEWS READ MORE »
Turkish Airlines Launches Melbourne Flights via Singapore Turkish Airlines has expanded its portfolio of operations in Australia with the launch of a new service to Melbourne on Saturday. ROUTES READ MORE »
As Pressure Mounts, Boeing May be Forced to Purchase its Fuselage Supplier Spirit AeroSystems In the spotlight to improve its safety, Boeing is in discussions to acquire Spirit AeroSystems Inc., to reclaim control of its challenged former aerostructures unit and the main supplier that makes the bodies of the troubled 737 MAX planes. NEWS READ MORE »


SHOP

$2999
NEW!AeroXplorer Aviation Sweater Use code AVGEEK for 10% off! BUY NOW

FOLLOW US ONLINE