The black boxes of the Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 aircraft that crashed several weeks ago in Muan, South Korea, stopped working during the last four minutes of the flight. The crash killed 179 of the 181 people onboard.
Without the flight data and cockpit voice recorders, investigators now face a significant setback as they lack crucial information that promised to shed light on the incident.

Missing Data from Onboard Flight and Voice Recorders
On Saturday, the South Korean Transport Ministry announced that the two black boxes, including the flight data and cockpit voice recorders, from Jeju Air Flight 2216 stopped recording four minutes before the fatal accident. Previously, investigators had said that the data contained inside the black boxes were key to determining the cause of the deadly crash.
These data recorders capture the aircraft’s movements, which could have helped to explain the teardrop maneuver and eventual belly landing, as well as the dialogue between pilots, which would have allowed investigators to understand the decisions made leading up to the deadly landing attempt.
After the crash, South Korean officials analyzed the black boxes before sending them to the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for further review. However, the NTSB confirmed what South Korean investigators already suspected: that some data was missing from the recorders.

“Data from the CVR (cockpit voice recorder) and FDR (flight data recorder) are crucial in investigating accidents, but such investigations are conducted through the examination and analysis of various sources of information, and we plan to do our utmost to determine the cause of the accident,” the South Korean ministry said in a statement.
However, while the missing black boxes pose a major setback to the investigation, they may give investigators new insight into what happened following the bird strike.
Around the time the data recorders failed, the pilots told air traffic controllers that they had suffered a bird strike, subsequently declaring an emergency. Since the flight data and voice recorders both failed directly following the bird strike, it suggests that all power systems failed, including the backup power systems that the black boxes rely on in the event of a power loss onboard the aircraft.
If the aircraft did lose all power, it could explain part of the decision to “teardrop” back to the airport and land on the runway in the opposite direction. It could also possibly explain the failure of the landing gear and deployment of spoilers, which slow an aircraft down after landing.
Investigators still have not reached any concrete conclusions about the cause of the crash, with the power failure discussed above only one possible explanation.
PHOTOS: Inside Gulfstream's New G800, the World's Longest-Range Business Jet » Air France Announces Paris-Las Vegas Nonstop Service » Pakistan International Airlines Returns to Manchester after 5-Year Ban »
Comments (5)
Jeff
I am an airline Captain. Honestly, the media’s insistence that this crash is somehow mysterious, is kind of laughable. They probably shut down the wrong engine after the bird strike and subsequent go around. Either that, or there was a mysterious, double bird strike in the left engine. No CVR, means no ENGINE power. It also explains the lack of gear and flaps. The teardrop turn around maneuver, and the fact they had enough altitude and speed to even turn around and land, means that one engine was working for most of the emergency. Also, according to Aviation week, the Korean government plans to modify airport infrastructure and “step up pilot training in emergency engine shutdown scenarios” for pilots. I think they already know what happened.
Chris
Those last few minutes are important yes.
But why are they holding back on the event while on their first final approach while properly configured. ADSB shows a stabilized approach even at 409 feet. Why in earth would anyone attempt a go around when only a few more seconds to touchdown. What was the confusion on deciding to miss because of a tower controller changing the runway to 19?
Well, Im mystified of the fact that not a single word has been said of the pilots. Normally the first thing to read is the profile and experience of the flight crew.
Secondly, the flaps an gear should have been deployd already of the first approach ! Hard to belive that they would retract them for the goaround, except though, that they didnt have thrust enough. But this should all have beed visual from the tower. So was there at all anyone at home in the tower ?
Add Your Comment
SHARE
TAGS
NEWS Jeju Air Black Box South Korea Air Crash Air Crash InvestigationRECENTLY PUBLISHED
Pakistan International Airlines Returns to Manchester after 5-Year Ban
After a hiatus of more than five years, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) has resumed flights to the United Kingdom. The newly reinstated nonstop service between Islamabad (ISB) and Manchester (MAN) officially took off on October 25th.
ROUTES
READ MORE »
This Delaware Firm is Saving FBOs Millions in Hangar Costs
When most people picture innovation in the aerospace industry, they envision new airline or aircraft startups that revolutionize the way people travel. But sometimes, the biggest revolutions happen on the ground. One Delaware-based aviation firm is quietly shaping the way airports, FBOs, and MROs move aircraft, and saving them millions of dollars in the process.
STORIES
READ MORE »
Air France Announces Paris-Las Vegas Nonstop Service
Air France is expanding its US operations with a new nonstop service from Paris to Las Vegas, significantly enhancing travel options between these two cities. This strategic move not only benefits travelers but also promises economic growth and cultural exchange, while positioning Air France as a key player in the competitive transatlantic market.
ROUTES
READ MORE »