The black boxes of the Jeju Air Boeing 737-800 aircraft that crashed several weeks ago in Muan, South Korea, stopped working during the last four minutes of the flight. The crash killed 179 of the 181 people onboard.
Without the flight data and cockpit voice recorders, investigators now face a significant setback as they lack crucial information that promised to shed light on the incident.

Missing Data from Onboard Flight and Voice Recorders
On Saturday, the South Korean Transport Ministry announced that the two black boxes, including the flight data and cockpit voice recorders, from Jeju Air Flight 2216 stopped recording four minutes before the fatal accident. Previously, investigators had said that the data contained inside the black boxes were key to determining the cause of the deadly crash.
These data recorders capture the aircraft’s movements, which could have helped to explain the teardrop maneuver and eventual belly landing, as well as the dialogue between pilots, which would have allowed investigators to understand the decisions made leading up to the deadly landing attempt.
After the crash, South Korean officials analyzed the black boxes before sending them to the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) for further review. However, the NTSB confirmed what South Korean investigators already suspected: that some data was missing from the recorders.

“Data from the CVR (cockpit voice recorder) and FDR (flight data recorder) are crucial in investigating accidents, but such investigations are conducted through the examination and analysis of various sources of information, and we plan to do our utmost to determine the cause of the accident,” the South Korean ministry said in a statement.
However, while the missing black boxes pose a major setback to the investigation, they may give investigators new insight into what happened following the bird strike.
Around the time the data recorders failed, the pilots told air traffic controllers that they had suffered a bird strike, subsequently declaring an emergency. Since the flight data and voice recorders both failed directly following the bird strike, it suggests that all power systems failed, including the backup power systems that the black boxes rely on in the event of a power loss onboard the aircraft.
If the aircraft did lose all power, it could explain part of the decision to “teardrop” back to the airport and land on the runway in the opposite direction. It could also possibly explain the failure of the landing gear and deployment of spoilers, which slow an aircraft down after landing.
Investigators still have not reached any concrete conclusions about the cause of the crash, with the power failure discussed above only one possible explanation.
United Airlines Fires Flight Attendants for Missing Reserve Assignments, Sparking Union Backlash » Frontier Airlines Becomes First US Ultra-Low-Cost Carrier to Adopt Starlink WiFi » This Week in Aviation: The 10 Stories That Mattered Most »
Comments (4)
Jeff
I am an airline Captain. Honestly, the media’s insistence that this crash is somehow mysterious, is kind of laughable. They probably shut down the wrong engine after the bird strike and subsequent go around. Either that, or there was a mysterious, double bird strike in the left engine. No CVR, means no ENGINE power. It also explains the lack of gear and flaps. The teardrop turn around maneuver, and the fact they had enough altitude and speed to even turn around and land, means that one engine was working for most of the emergency. Also, according to Aviation week, the Korean government plans to modify airport infrastructure and “step up pilot training in emergency engine shutdown scenarios” for pilots. I think they already know what happened.
Chris
Those last few minutes are important yes.
But why are they holding back on the event while on their first final approach while properly configured. ADSB shows a stabilized approach even at 409 feet. Why in earth would anyone attempt a go around when only a few more seconds to touchdown. What was the confusion on deciding to miss because of a tower controller changing the runway to 19?
[hidden]
[hidden]
Add Your Comment
TAGS
NEWS Jeju Air Black Box South Korea Air Crash Air Crash InvestigationRECENTLY PUBLISHED
Anduril and Archer Unveil Dual-Use Autonomous VTOL Platform at Farnborough
Anduril and Archer Aviation revealed a jointly developed series hybrid-electric VTOL platform this afternoon at Farnborough, marking one of the most significant crossovers yet between commercial eVTOL technology and defense aviation.
NEWS
READ MORE »
Philippine Airlines Orders Up to 20 Boeing 787 Dreamliners in Major Fleet Expansion
Philippine Airlines commits to purchasing up to 20 Boeing 787 Dreamliners, marking a major fleet expansion for the flag carrier's long-haul operations.
NEWS
READ MORE »
De Havilland Canada and Widerøe Ink Deal to Extend Dash 8-400 A-Check Intervals
De Havilland Canada and Norwegian carrier Widerøe have signed an agreement to escalate A-Check intervals on the Dash 8-400 fleet, reducing downtime.
NEWS
READ MORE »
More than just headlines.
Get unlimited ad-free access to in-depth aviation news, premium stories, and exclusive insights other sites don't cover.
- Ad-free browsing on AeroXplorer
- Unlimited access to premium and exclusive articles
- Higher photo upload limits & commissions on sales
- Free access to Jetstream Magazine on higher tiers
- Ad-free browsing
- Sell aviation photos with 60% commission
- First week free!
- Everything in Basic+
- Unlimited premium articles
- Sell aviation photos with 70% commission
- Free Digital subscription to Jetstream Magazine
- First week free!
- Everything in Basic+ and Pro
- Sell aviaiton photos with 80% commission
- Early access to exclusive stories
- Free Digital+Print subscription to Jetstream Magazine