Within its short lifetime, JetBlue has become a beloved carrier with an innovative product and low-cost business model. It has grown rapidly to become a major U.S. airlinesSeeing success throughout its first 20 years in existence. However, if the carrier had its way, it would have grown even more from mergers throughout the past decade.
JetBlue’s first merger target was low-cost carrier Virgin America. A San Francisco-based startup, Virgin America was very similar to JetBlue: both focused on offering low-cost travel options with an elevated travel experience, both operated a fleet of Airbus A320 family aircraft, and both had a positive reputation within the industry. Fleet commonality and similar business models made a strong case for a merger between the two. Additionally, the fact that JetBlue’s network was largely concentrated on the East Coast while Virgin America was on the West meant that the combined carrier expanded its network and customer base.
However, the geographic factors that made Virgin America an attractive target also acted as a massive selling point for Seattle-based Alaska Airlines. Alaska Airlines, who focused their routes on the West Coast, also made a bid to acquire Virgin America in hopes of further solidifying its position as a West Coast airline. In the end, Alaska was willing to pay more for the deal, leaving JetBlue without a merger partner. JetBlue continued to grow on its own, improving its product and entering new, mostly leisure-oriented markets.
However, another opportunity to grow through consolidation presented itself recently, when Frontier announced its intention to merge with ultra-low-cost carrier Spirit Airlines. Weeks after this announcement, JetBlue made a bid to acquire Spirit as well, and offered more money per share for the acquisition. Ultimately, Spirit is siding with Frontier, having rejected an earlier JetBlue bid, forcing the airline to respond with a "hostile" bid just yesterday. While a merger with JetBlue would boost the combined carrier’s East Coast presence (specifically in Florida), other factors, such as regulatory approval and differences in business models, serve as significant flaws in the proposed deal. Once again, JetBlue has found itself without a merger partner. However, given the success of the carrier’s products, it is likely that JetBlue will continue to expand its offerings without the assistance of consolidation.
South Africa’s Largest Low-Cost Airline, Flysafair, Faces Potential License Withdrawal Over Ownership Dispute » Alaska and Hawaiian Airlines Announce First Route Changes Since Merger » Judge Orders Oakland Airport To Remove San Francisco From Name »